home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=91TT2931>
- <title>
- Dec. 30, 1991: Was She Right to Go Public?
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1991
- Dec. 30, 1991 The Search For Mary
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- ETHICS, Page 61
- Was She Right to Go Public?
- </hdr><body>
- <p>After long insisting on anonymity, Willie Smith's accuser raises
- issues of fairness by revealing herself on TV
- </p>
- <p>By Richard Zoglin--With reporting by Sophfronia Scott Gregory/
- New York
- </p>
- <p> Her face was obscured at first by a small gray dot, then
- by a big blue one. Most stations bleeped out her name when it
- was mentioned during the trial. And news editors across the
- country wrestled with a tough question: whether to override a
- basic principle of journalism--to give the public all the
- available facts--in order to protect her wish for privacy and
- a chance to live a normal life after the case was closed. So
- when the woman who accused William Kennedy Smith of rape shed
- her anonymity on ABC's PrimeTime Live last week, the nation's
- press corps could have been excused a muted groan. What was the
- point of all that self-censoring if she was going to reveal
- herself on a TV talk show scarcely a week later?
- </p>
- <p> Patricia Bowman--the name virtually every news
- organization now felt free to use--told ABC's Diane Sawyer
- that she came forward so that other rape victims would not be
- scared off by her experiences. "I'm not a blue blob. I'm a
- person," she said. "I have nothing to be ashamed of." According
- to her lawyer, David Roth, Bowman turned down offers of up to
- $500,000 to tell her story, choosing Sawyer because of her
- "impeccable reputation for integrity." PrimeTime paid her
- nothing, but she told Sawyer she would not rule out taking money
- for future interviews.
- </p>
- <p> Editors and broadcast executives were justified in feeling
- disconcerted. "I think we did the right thing [to hide her
- identity]," said Tom Johnson, president of CNN. "But I do feel
- awkward about it now." Johnson and other news executives said
- her about-face will not change their attitude toward identifying
- rape victims. Explained an ABC News spokesperson: "Our policy
- is not to reveal the names of rape victims unless they choose.
- If at any time during the process they choose to go public, then
- we would name them." One news organization that may feel
- vindicated: NBC, the only TV network that consistently broadcast
- Bowman's name.
- </p>
- <p> For the most part, the press was extraordinarily
- deferential toward Bowman. One news organization that initially
- named her, the New York Times, reversed itself after an early
- article describing Bowman's background drew heavy criticism.
- Even after the acquittal, most news organizations continued to
- withhold her name.
- </p>
- <p> Bowman's appearance raised other fairness questions:
- Should she be allowed, after the prosecution failed to prove her
- charges in court, to reargue the case on the TV talk-show
- circuit, where there are no rules of evidence? That, at least,
- is a double-edged sword. Under Sawyer's questioning, Bowman
- reiterated her version of events on the night she claims she was
- raped. But she also had to face questions about issues that were
- kept out of the trial, like her alleged drug use, abortions, and
- her experiences as an abused child. No one, of course, can be
- denied a chance to tell his or her side of a controversial
- story, and appearing on TV talk shows has become almost a
- constitutional right in America. But the sight of Bowman going
- public in prime time will surely linger in the minds of news
- executives the next time a victim's plea for privacy clashes
- with the prerogatives of a free press.
- </p>
-
- </body></article>
- </text>
-
-